Impact Of A Mediated Society On Society - 1735 Words

Impact of a Mediated Society Mass media has a direct and enormous affect on the current society from pop culture gossip to education among schools. The media is not only present in the environment but goes to lengths to control and dictate the feelings and perceptions of the current generation. Given that technology constantly reaches kids at younger ages, the prevalent existence influences children at younger years as time passes. Living in a highly mediated society shapes the way people see themselves by setting unrealistic expectations for themselves in terms of achieving ‘perfection.’ In addition, the mediated society affects how people see each other. The media is always feeding the public the next ‘cool factor,’ and expects people†¦show more content†¦It changes the way we see ourselves, each other, and the way our lives are organized. One could argue that there are both positive and negative aspects to living in a highly mediated society. The first is that this current generation of media and technology gives an individual unbelievable access to knowledge and information. With just the click of a button, children, students, and adults can use countless search engines to view news articles and books. News reporting has evolved onto the internet with email subscriptions such as â€Å"The Skimm.† This subscription sends emails every weekday morning with current event, political, economic, and social updates. In addition, the media is also saturated with gossip columns that inform the public about current pop-culture topics such as the black and blue vs. white and gold dress scenario. This idea all started with a woman taking a picture of her dress and posting it on social media. In addition, one image was posted on the internet which started the â€Å"Black Lives Matter† movement. All in all, the technology that has evolved throughout the years not only is able to inform the public but can be looked at as a positive aspect of mass media . Ideas like these keep an individual not only informed, but educated. According to social activist and author, Bell Hooks, â€Å"pop-culture is where the learning is.† Without media and technology, would students be eager to read the newspaper, probably not. On the contrary to the

Restrictions on Free Speech in Malaysia - 2182 Words

Protecting Free Speech, by using Restrictions? It is undeniable that the citizens of Malaysia have been granted the freedom of speech, assembly and association, as stated in the Act 10 of the Federal Constitution. Quoted from the Federal Constitution, every citizen has the right to free expression and speech. However, freedom of speech is an issue which has been discussed and argued for a long time, not only in Malaysia but all around the world. It is discussed that how â€Å"free† a speech can be. Does freedom of speech mean that we can simply talk something bad about the ruler without any evidence? Liberty (2014) defines that the freedom of speech includes the right of every citizen in communicating and expressing in any medium, holding opinions, receiving information ideas and participating in demonstration and protest without the interference of the country or government. Although by judging solely from the definition, political expression which covers the matters of public interest seems acceptable, it is undeniable that under the Act 10 of the Federal Constitution, clause 2 has stated that the parliament can impose law to restrict the freedom of speech. Such restrictions are said to protect the security of Malaysia, privileges of Parliament and the public order. Besides, Art 10 (4) also stated that the law can restrict the questioning of any matter, status, privilege and sovereignty. InterNations (2014) has also explained that there are also limitations of civil freedomsShow MoreRelatedDevelopment Of Singapore And Malaysia Essay1393 Words   |  6 PagesSingapore and Malaysia (henceforth referred to as DRC), are facing similar problems in their countries, although they are at different level of development. Singapore is ranked as world’s top 10 wealthiest countries, from rapid development since the late 1950s. Meanwhile, Malaysia is still a developing country where it’s GDP(10,000USD) is compared to Singapore’s 55,000 USD, which is nearly five times that of Malaysia. Such difference between two countries also can be seen in their corruption rateRead MoreIs Malaysia A Freedom For Democracy?1264 Words   |  6 PagesMalaysia currently holds the status of being partly free in terms of having democracy in the country. According to the freedomhouse.org it has a freedom rating score of 4.0, with a Civil liberty and Political rights score of 4. Prospects for democracy in Malaysia are moderately fair. While many structural factors favoring democracy are in place, and opposition movements pushing for democracy do exist, it receives a lower freedom rating score due to its government intimidating political opponentsRead MoreFree and Fair Election1504 Words   |  7 PagesFree and Fair Election The electoral system have to be fair and just and to ensure this, free and fair election will be held when the Parliament is dissolved or finish it’s sitting duration of 5 years. A free and fair election must be in orderly manner and it must not have Coup d’à ©tat. Coup d’à ©tat is meant by a sudden decisive exercise of force in politics . It is an alteration of an existing government by a small group that tend to create riots and chaos. The current Malaysia government believeRead MoreMedia Censorship around the World2803 Words   |  12 Pagespress and impose severe restrictions on journalists. Freedom House, an international human rights group, labels these countries as ‘not free’ as the governments impose several restrictions on the press and journalists. According to Universal Declaration of human rights, â€Å"freedom of expression is the right of every individual to hold opinions without any obstruction and to gather, find and reveal i nformation and ideas through any media regardless of any frontiers†. In Malaysia, freedom of expressionRead MoreHistory Of Trans Pacific Partnership899 Words   |  4 PagesHistory of the Trans-Pacific Partnership The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a secretive, multinational trade agreement being negotiated among countries bordering the Pacific Ocean, including the United States, Japan, Vietnam, Australia, Chile, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, Canada, Mexico, and Brunei Darussalam. Together they represent about 40% of the global Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The TPP is expected to reduce (or eliminate) trade barriers, facilitate the development of production andRead MoreMalaysia s Transition Into Democracy2255 Words   |  10 PagesWhile Malaysia has shown vast amounts of progress in their civil society, the country still shows significant issues that may prevent a fully developed democracy from blooming fully and staying true in the future. Their Civil Society still battles being constantly repressed by their government along with ethnic conflict, and even their media outlets are still highly controlled by the government. The only way that Malaysia may be able to stay true to democrac y is if a political change in culture occursRead MoreThe Factors That Contribute to the Restriction in Freedom of Speech and Information in Malaysia Towards Iukls Local Students9027 Words   |  37 PagesCHAPTER 1 THE FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE RESTRICTION IN FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND INFORMATION IN MALAYSIA TOWARDS IUKLS LOCAL STUDENTS 1.1 Introduction Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. (The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 19, 1948). Freedom of speech and information is the one of the rightsRead MoreThe Asia Pacific Economic Corporation Essay1452 Words   |  6 Pagesmethodology, norms and conformance, versatility of representatives, licensed innovation rights, rivalry strategy, government acquisition and standards of starting point. Setting up members include Australia, Brunei, Canada, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and the United States. APEC works forward higher standard of living and advanced education through feasible economic growth. APEC includes all major economies of the region and the most progressiveRead MoreNgos And Freedom Of Expression1719 Words   |  7 Pagesfollows: †¢ Freedom House advocates for democracy, political freedom, and human rights. In its Freedom of Expression campaign, it provides financial and technical assistance to advocates of free expression within individual countries. It also delegates experts to countries that are implementing legislation regarding free expression, to collaborate with local organisations and make recommendations about addressing restrictive laws (Freedom House 2015). It also produces publications such as Freedom in theRead MoreFundamental Liberties in Federal Constitution2333 Words   |  10 PagesFundamental liberties in Malaysia can best being referred to our own Federal Constitution (FC). It is fall into part II of the Federal Constitution. It basically refers to Malaysian liberties throughout their lives living in Malaysia. There are 9 articles regarding the fundamental in the Federal Constitution starting from articles 5 to 13. The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights also recognis ed fundamental liberties as it stated that,all human beings are born free and equal in dignity

Comparing Fordism and Scientific Management Free Essays

string(136) " many people soon left their line jobs, because of the unpleasant monotony of the work and the repeated increases in production quotas\." Fordism and Scientific Management are terms used to describe management that had application to practical situations with extremely dramatic effects. Fordism takes its name from the mass production units of Henry Ford, and is identified by an involved technical division of labour within companies and their production units. Other characteristics of Fordism include strong hierarchical control, with workers in a production line often restricted to the one single task, usually specialised and unskilled. We will write a custom essay sample on Comparing Fordism and Scientific Management or any similar topic only for you Order Now Scientific management, on the other hand, â€Å"originated† through Fredrick Winslow Taylor in 1911, and in very basic terms described the one best way work could be done and that the best way to improve output was to improve the techniques or methods used by the workers. (Robbins p. 38) Many comparisons can be made between the two theories, such as the mechanisation, fragmentation and specialisation of work and that a lack of intellectual or skilled content will speed up the work at hand. Fordism’s mechanisation of mass production further emphasised many of Taylor†s popular beliefs about management being divorced from human affairs and emotions, using ‘humans as instruments or machines to be manipulated by their leaders† (Hersey p. 84). Fordism fused and emphasised the scientific methods to get things done by Ford†s successful mass-production processes. Contrasts also exist between the two theories. Fordism dehumanisied the worker whereas scientific management convinced the workers that their goals could be readily achieved along with their employers goals, therefore they should all work together in this direction. Fordism suited industrial companies participating in mass production, whereas Scientific Management could be used in many types of organisation. Large companies such as Ford Motors, The Reichskuratorium fur Wirtschaftkichkeit (RKW) in Germany examples these theories in practice. These theories of the past are lessons for the way modern organisations are run today. Managers now realise that they should treat their workers more democratically and since the mid-70†³s, sweeping changes in markets and technology have encouraged managers and manufacturers to use greater product diversity and more flexible methods of production. Movements towards a more flexible organisation have become apparent. Examples of orgainisations such as Nissan, NASA and Toyota serve as modern day examples of post-Fordism and depict movement towards a modified Scientific Management. Comparisons that can be made include Fordism’s mechanisation of mass production and Taylor†s attempts at using employees as machines. Taylor designed this using his principles of management that included developing a science for each element of work and finding the quickest way the job could be done. Henry Ford†s ideal types of Fordist production system included using fixed and dedicated machines in individuals work, rather than turning the employee into a machine. (Hollinshead 1995) With Taylor attempting to prove to the world that there was a science to management and that the quickest way was the best way, he attacked the incompetence of managers for their inefficiencies in running the railroads and factories. Using time and motion studies, Taylor achieved productivity increases of up to 200 per cent. (Dunphy, 1998, p. 4). His thoughts were echoed by others: during a 1910 Interstate Commerce Commission hearing, Louis D. Brandeis argued that US railroads could save a million dollars a day if they introduced scientific management into their operations (Oakes, 1996). Taylor showed the world that the methodical and scientific study of work could lead to improved efficiency. He believed that by defining clear guidelines for workers many improvements could be made to the production of goods. Fordism like Scientific Management in the newly mechanised industries of the early 20th century emphasised that efficiency came from precision in job design, clear division of responsibilities and tight policing of implementation (Taylor, 1911). Taylorism and Fordism were consistent with notions of the organisation as † a ‘military machine† first developed by Frederick the Great of Prussia, and later refined by Henri Fayol†. (Taplin, 1995, p. 430) Scientific Management encouraged firms to improve efficiency by analysing individual processes of industrial production and then recreating them to produce maximum output from any given size labor force. (Hudson, 1997) Ford’s production-line innovations compounded scientific management†s efficiencies into the economy. Taylor believed it would be best to scientifically select, train, teach and develop the workers. However, in contrast, Fordism was based on mass production using semi skilled workers who could be easily replaced. Fordism did not care for the workers to work as a team and to ‘Heartily co-operate †¦ to ensure that all work is done in accordance with the principles of science† like Taylor†s ideas of scientific management did (Robbins,1997, p. 40). Although Fordism borrowed many scientific management ideas, it then advanced upon them to produce a new form of management that included management having hierarchical authority and technical control. Fordism enabled managers to regulate production and safeguard their own position within firms as well as meeting the efficiency criteria set by owners. The obvious efficiencies of Fordism and features that were responsible for the economic successes of this system, also caused problems. Fordism proved particularly suitable to manufacturing in a mass consumption economy, required only occasional innovation of new products and used machines that only made specific goods. Often, these were of low-quality, low-value, high-volume nature, and competition was price based. Low quality could easily become poor quality; workers were poorly motivated with resulting high labor turnover and absenteeism; and coordinating the flow of materials through production processes was difficult (Wood, 1993). Fordism led to massive increases in productivity in certain industries, but the human cost was significant. At one point Henry Ford’s assembly lines had an annual employee turnover of 380 per cent (Encarta, 1998). Fordism alienated workers and allowed no creativity. Where scientific management looked to divide work and responsibility almost equally between management and workers, Fordism was after minimum discretion between management and workers with fragmented work and minimal tasks for employees. Examining what happened at the Ford Motor Company supports these facts. In 1913 Ford began using monotonous assembly-line techniques in his plant. Although assembly-line techniques greatly increased productivity, many people soon left their line jobs, because of the unpleasant monotony of the work and the repeated increases in production quotas. You read "Comparing Fordism and Scientific Management" in category "Essay examples" This is something that contemporary management techniques have realised; it is beneficial for employees to become involved within their jobs and not expected to be machines. Ford partly overcame this problem by doubling the daily wage then standard in the industry with his famous offer of ‘$5 a day to workers who would put up with the alienated, regimented work conditions at Ford Motors† (Clark, 1997). One worker said, â€Å"You†ve got to work like hell at Ford†s†¦ You can†t let up. You†ve got to get out the production†¦ nd if you can†t get it out, you get out† (Rupert, 1997, p. 11) His results were increased stability in Fords labor force and a substantial reduction in operating costs. Then the Model T automobile was introduced in 1908. With the help of this model, Ford became America†s largest automobile producer and vendor. Nevertheless throughout the 1930s Ford began losing business to his competitors, mainly because they were slow introducing new models of automobiles every year. (Encarta, 1998) Scientific Management and Fordism created a new type of ‘revolution†. The promise of massive increases in productivity led to the following of Fords and Taylor†s models of management all over the world. Britain never had a scientific management movement like that in America, and the leading British engineering journals in the early 20th century revealed Taylorism receiving attention, much of it positive. Engineering became an unqualified supporter of scientific management, only The Engineer, a journal of engineering at the time, maintained sustained hostility to Taylorism declaring it was unfair and inhuman and not â€Å"sportsmanlike. The Engineer criticised the separation of workers thinking in their jobs from doing their jobs and described Taylorism as â€Å"scientific management gone mad. † (Whitson, 1997) Another organisation that followed both the American models of Taylor and Ford, was The Reichskuratorium fur Wirtschaftkichkeit (RKW) founded in 1921. This huge Berlin-based electro-technical and machine-constructing conglomerate strove to implement measures of industrial and organisational efficiency in Germany in the inter-war era. RKW†s aim was to â€Å"implement technical and organisational measures of industrial, and economic efficiency, an organization devoted to industry; efficiency, and production standardization. † (Shearer, 1997, p. 569) In modern times, firms have attempted to reconfigure work places and production systems using flat hierarchies and lean production systems in contrast to Scientific and Fordist management. Managers presume that these sorts of changes will enable firms to achieve flexibility, seen by many managers as essential to maintaining competitive advantage into and beyond the 21st Century. Flexible production systems opposing strict Fordist lines, made possible by these organisational changes and new technologies, permit shortened product development time. There is a new way of organising production and a departure from Fordism and all it contains. However, scientific management was used by Japanese automobile constructors in the 1970s when they began to compete using â€Å"fundamentally improved manufacturing processes that consistently produced vehicles of higher quality far faster than Detroit† (Oakes p. 569). Japan car manufacturers successfully decreased labour and production costs giving American Manufacturers a run for their money, Japans Toyota is an example that used Fordism as a base of new managerial processes. Another modern day example, which drew on these two management methods, was in space science. NASA developed a set of measures to assess if they were implementing their own strategies. NASA’s strategy, defined by the motto ‘cheaper, faster, better,† was to reduce the size and cost of space probes without eliminating any important missions. Figures show that the two missions to Mars launched in late 1996 were each one-fifth the real cost of previous Mars missions (under $200 million in 1996 dollars, as opposed to an average of $1 billion each for the previous eleven U. S. spacecraft launched for Mars)†. (Oakes, 1996, p. 589) Post-Fordism has been described as a â€Å"shift to the new information technologies;[a] more flexible, decentralized form of labour process and of targeting consumers by lifestyle taste and culture rather than by categories of social class†¦ as well as] a rise of the service and white-collar classes and the feminization of the workforce:† These are lessons managers have learnt and result in less rigidity and mechanisation and a reduction in the blue-collar masculine workforce. The firms that face the most difficulties in the new globalised marketplace are often those with labor intensive, standardised manufacturing processes. Companies emphasise that these new forms of work provide better jobs. For instance, Nissan projects an image of work as taking place in an empowering environment built around the themes of flexibility, quality and teamwork. In conclusion, both Fordism and Scientific Management share common themes yet also display some significant differences. They both encourage looking at the fastest way work can be completed and impose strict guidelines upon employees and their job descriptions. This has led to a great deal of dissatisfaction among employees in production lines with alienation and monotony of workers that encouraged a high turnover of employees at organisations that imposed these techniques. Henry Ford developed much of his conceptions upon Taylor†s ideas of scientific management. These theories imply that contemporary organisations and their managers should take into consideration the ideas of employees to avoid division. Managers today often see workers as multi-skilled and more involved in the process of production via teamwork, the reintegration of manual and mental labour, and the empowerment of production workers. Today†s mass production has seen technology wiping out many of the jobs once held by these employees. There is a movement towards a more flexible workplace in the wave of this new technology away from strict guidelines imposed upon workers and their job descriptions, they are now encouraged to learn about other areas of the workplace. Fordism and scientific management have greatly influenced our workplace today and their theories will continue to be built upon for years to come. How to cite Comparing Fordism and Scientific Management, Essay examples

1984 Essay Conclusion Example For Students

1984 Essay Conclusion Winston Smith, the main character, works in London, at the Ministry of Truth. London isa city in Airstrip One, a Province of Oceania. A government that goes by the name BigBrother has taken over the world. The Party with Big Brother as its leader rulesOceania, a state and one of the great powers of the world. Winston hates the life he livesunder the inflexible government and decides to write down his thoughts in a diary. Thisis considered a crime in Oceania and Winston knows that. And he knows one day he willbe discovered by the Thought Police. To keep the members of this party occupied, frequent two minute Hate Sessions areheld to accuse the enemies of the party such as Emmanuel Goldstein who questionedparty doctrines. Winston dreams of an pleasant country. A Golden country inwhich any form of expression is considered all right. The party discourages love,and makes any relationship with a party member impossible. Winston notices twopeople, OBrien a party leader, and a young girl by the name of Julia. Winston hatesJulia for being a part of The Party and yet he has an eye for her. She appears to be afaithful party member devoted to purity and Winston suspects that she may also be amember of the Thought Police. Winston shares his doubts about The Party with OBrien even though he realizedthat this may be very dangerous. The Parsons are Winstons neighbors. The Parsonchildren are members of the Spies, a party organization and Mr. Parson afellow employee is a dedicated party member who stupidly and blindly follows the partysdoctrine. Winston works at the Ministry of Truth. His assignment is the rewriting andfalsification of history so that it makes the party look better. Winston encounters Julia at work. She stumbles and when Winston tries to helpher she slips him a paper with I love you written on it. They have several encountersand finally manage to meet in privacy. Julia turns out to be a corrupt girl. They beginliving together. Winston and Julia visit OBrien and join the secret rebel Brotherhood. Except for the requirement to never see each other, they accept all terms of membership. Before long the fear that Winston had lived with for so long became a reality and theThought Police shows up at their house. The separate Winston and Julia. Winston isbeing held prisoner at the Ministry of Love. He finds out that OBrien has deceived him. Winston is tortured by OBrien in the infamous room 101 until he confesses to manycrimes he never committed. He is also being brain-washed so that he conforms to theparty doctrine. The ultimate torture is the use of rats that are caged and strapped over hisface to be released at any time. Winston had often dreamt of his mother and sister whowere eaten by rats. Once the Party is convinced that Winston is totally rehabilitated, he is set free. Hebegins drinking heavily. Nearing the end of the story, we are not quite sure whetherWinston has been brain-washed or not. Is he just pretending to have been completelycured by the Party or is he afraid to once again think of his thoughts of freedom? I believe George Orwell leaves the interpretation up to the reader. 1984 is afrightening novel. It gives the reader an a look into what might become of our world. Itlets us look at an ugly society where family and personal values are destroyed andreplaced by loyalty to Big Brother. BibliographynoneBo ok Reports